You must interprete that word as…
“We are trying to trick you and take more and more of your Rights away.”
They are Socialists. They do not know compromise.
To them compromise is the “nibble nibble nibble” in their march against the RKBA and decent and responsible people.
They employ the Socialist measure of “Means to an end” and “The end justifies the means.”
The “end”? Your Rights are gone and they control you and your family.
When they say “compromise”?
You say “Not One Inch!”.
“…”You know, law-abiding citizens aren’t always allowed to have everything they want. You may be able to have a Lamborghini [a very fast aned expensive Italian sports car], but you certainly can’t drive it 100 miles per hour on a city street,” he says. “We should learn from that and realize that gun laws work and save lives and can be totally reconciled with gun ownership and legitimate use of firearms.”
Gun control a divisive issue
Gun control advocates see the assault weapon ban as a reasonable compromise, a gray area in a pretty black-and-white issue. But speaking for pro-gun Americans, Hartman disagrees.
“People on either side don’t have any gray areas. You’re either for or against, and it’s pretty strongly held opinions. And I don’t think either side is going to change the other’s mind very readily.”…”
(the quotes are attributable to a Virginia paper. I blew out the link by accident.)
There is no US Constitutional right to cars. Cars do not preserve and protect the other Amendments of the Bill of Rights.
The US Constitution and Bill of Rights guarantees the Right to Keep and Bear arms.
“Compromise” in Mr. Siebal’s eyes is the attempted erosion of the BOR. That will only weaken the nation and it’s citizens.
What part of “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” do you not understand?
When it comes to “need”? American citizens don’t “need” people like Mr. Siebal.